Global hurricane
intensity not increasingÉso concludes a just-published paper by
University of Wisconsin atmospheric scientist Jim Kossin and colleagues. In
order that we canŐt be accused of misrepresenting the authorsŐ meaning, here is
the complete conclusion section of their Geophysical Research Letters paper
[we added emphasis just for fun –eds]:
The time-dependent
differences between the UW/NCDC and JTWC best track records underscores the
potential for data inconsistencies to introduce spurious (or spuriously large)
upward trends in longer-term measures of hurricane activity. Using a
homogeneous record, we were not able to corroborate the presence of upward
trends in hurricane intensity over the past two decades in any basin other than
the Atlantic. Since
the Atlantic basin accounts for less than 15% of global hurricane activity, this result
poses a challenge to hypotheses that directly relate globally increasing
tropical SST to increases in long-term mean global hurricane intensity.
Efforts are presently
underway to maximize the length of our new homogeneous data record but at most
we can add another 6–7 years, and whether meaningful trends can be
measured or inferred in a 30-year data record remains very much an open
question. Given these limitations of the data, the question of whether
hurricane intensity is globally trending upwards in a warming climate will
likely remain a point of debate in the foreseeable future. Still, the very real
and dangerous increases in recent Atlantic hurricane activity will no doubt
continue to provide a heightened sense of purpose to research addressing how
hurricane behavior might change in our changing climate, and further efforts
toward improvement of archival data quality are expected to continue in
parallel with efforts to better reconcile the physical processes involved. If our 23-year
record is in fact representative of the longer record, then we need to better
understand why hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin is varying in a
fundamentally different way than the rest of the world despite similar upward
trends of SST in each basin.
All we can say is Ňoh
my.Ó Can it be possible that the small band of global warming alarmists who is
going around pushing the concept that global warming has led to measurably more
dangerous hurricanes is wrong? Horrors.
LetŐs see what the IPCC
has to say about this. Here is the section on hurricanes from their recent Summary
for Policymakers (SPM):
There is observational
evidence for an increase of intense tropical cyclone activity in the North
Atlantic since about 1970, correlated with increases of tropical sea surface
temperatures. There are also suggestions of increased intense tropical cyclone
activity in some other regions where concerns over data quality are greater.
Multi-decadal variability and the quality of the tropical cyclone records prior
to routine satellite observations in about 1970 complicate the detection of
long-term trends in tropical cyclone activity. There is no clear trend in the
annual numbers of tropical cyclones.
Well, it looks like the
SPM authors decided to play it a bit cautious. Only reporting ŇsuggestionsÓ of
increases in oceans basins other than the Atlantic. Wise move. These
suggestions now seem to be wrong.
Certainly it is
true that tropical cyclones have increased in frequency and intensity in the
Atlantic Ocean over the past 30 years. And certainly sea surface temperatures
have risen there as well. But as we have been harping on over and over and over
again, this does not mean that anthropogenic alterations to the earthŐs
atmospheric composition are the primary reason why (see any of the
articles listed here).
Many other factors besides sea surface temperatures impact the tendency for
weak tropical disturbances to grow into fierce hurricanes. And many of these
other factors have been trending in a way that is towards favoring stronger
storms, but that is away from the direction that global warming should be
taking them. Yes, you read it correctly, aside from increasing sea surface
temperatures, anthropogenic climate changes from increasing greenhouse gas
concentrations are generally projected to make the tropical environment less
favorable for tropical cyclone intensification. Nobody told you that one
before, did they (besides us, of course)?
What about the high
profile results from papers in Nature (Emanuel, 2005) and Science (Webster
et al, 2005) that made a lot of noise that intense hurricanes were increasing
the world over and that anthropogenic global warming was to blame? Well,
according to the new results by Kossin et al., and as has been suggested by
Landsea (2006) and others, it looks like they were the result of a reliance on
data of poor quality data. The figure below, from Kossin et al., shows a
comparison of their results from a consistent application of a new procedure
for determining hurricane intensity during the period 1984-2005, against the
results of using the currently existing data that apparently suffers from data
quality issues (the data that underlies the analyses of Emanuel and Webster et
al., and virtually everyone else).

Figure 1. A global comparison of Kossin et al.Ős new hurricane analysis (blue
lines) against the existing data (red lines) for Power Dissipation Index (top),
the number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes (middle), and the percentage of
category 4 and 5 hurricanes (bottom). (Source: Kossin et al., 2007).
Notice how the blue
curves (from the Kossin data) show a decidedly lack of upward trend since 1984,
instead, they are dominated by decadal variability.
Sure, individual
scientists can have individual opinions about the results and implications of
their work and that of others. And, to be sure, the issue of how anthropogenic
global warming may be, or may someday be, impacting hurricanes is far from
being settled. But the one thing that appears to be quite settled, is that currently,
anyone who insists that present-day hurricanes are definitely and measurably
being made worse the world over because of human emissions is outside of the
consensus of our best scientific understanding and as such, represents an
extremistŐs viewpoint on this issue. DonŐt let them try to convince you
otherwise.
References:
Emanuel, K., 2005.
Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature,
436, 686-688.
Kossin, J.P., et al.,
2007. A globally consistent reanalysis of hurricane variability and trends. Geophysical
Research Letters, 34, L4815, doi: 10.1029/2006GL028836.
Landsea, C.W., B.A.
Harper, K. Hoarau, J.A. Knaff. 2006. Can We Detect Trends in Extreme Tropical
Cyclones? Science, 313, 452-454.
Webster, P. J., et al., 2005.
Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming
environment. Science, 309, 1844-1846.